Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut - Miley Cyrus new hairstyle in which she had it cut very short is eliciting alot of jeers from the social media netizens. Miley Cyrus opted for a chic pixie meets rocker hairstyle. Miley’s new haircut is being ridiculed to be the same as Draco Malfoy portrayed by Tom Felton in the Harry Potter movies. This is reminiscent of what Charice just did with her hair too which a radical departure from her previous look. Miley Cyrus cut hair hair short for the benefit of a cancer foundation. In short, Miley Cyrus cut hair to donate it to charity and she got a lot of flak for cutting her hair short but just a little praise for doing a charitable act. Miley Cyrus is engaged to The Hunger Games star, Liam Hemsworth.
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
Miley Cyrus Draco Malfoy Haircut
The Twitter world turned its attention to the recently-engaged star's haircut - short and blonde. She tweeted she has "never felt more me in my whole life" and "if you don't have something nice to say don't say anything at all. my hair is attached to my head no one else's and it's going bye bye :)."
On Monday morning, while scrolling through Twitter, I noticed that one of the day's top trending topics was that of former Disney star-turned-actress-turned-popstar Miley Cyrus. Intrigued by a couple of messages on my newsfeed stating that we should “leave Miley alone”, I decided to do a little digging and see what all the fuss was about. It turns out that all the girl had done was decide to cut her shoulder-length hair into a shorter style, and had posted a few photos of her new look on Twitter. But rather depressingly, had been subjected to a whole barrage of hate because of it.
Now, like most of the population over the age of 12, I couldn't give two shits about Miley Cyrus. In fact, I used to think she and Hannah Montana were two entirely separate people before I was ridiculed by a friend and informed that the latter was her all-singing, all-dancing, fictional alter-ego. I don't care what Miley is doing, who she's sleeping with, or how much weight she's lost. But while the details of her personal life do not interest me, I was pretty astonished to see so much abuse hurled at a young girl simply because she cut her hair.
The reactions to Miley's new look consisted of thousands of pubescent social networkers telling her that she was ugly and that she looked like a man and a lesbian, with endless comparisons being made to Draco Malfoy. Some “fans” even went as far to express their disapproval over her haircut by claiming they didn't like her anymore. Seriously, are you fucking joking me?
It made me pretty pissed off to see that the idea that women can only be beautiful or feminine if they have long hair is still quite clearly embedded into social attitudes. When the likes of Brad Pitt or Johnny Depp choose to grow their hair, no-one bats an eyelid. In fact, they're often referred to as rugged and handsome. So why is it that when a woman cuts her hair shorter, she is instantly branded as masculine? Are the likes of Miley Cyrus, Michelle Williams, or Emma Watson considered to be less feminine than say, Cheryl Cole? Last time I checked, being in possession of a vagina was what made you a woman, and not the length of the hair on your head.
Unfortunately, Miley clearly felt the need to explain her decision and took to Twitter to defend her new haircut, saying it made her feel “pretty” and “free”. But why should she have to justify a bloody haircut? It's her hair, and she gets to choose what she does with it. I'm sure many of the people slagging her off would have a fucking nervous breakdown if they were abused for something so regular and mundane as a new haircut.
Soon, news that Miley had donated her hair to a cancer charity began circling around Twitter. Whether this is true or not, we don't know for sure. If she really donated her hair to charity, then that's great. But if she didn't, and just wanted a new, shorter haircut, then who gives a shit? Why does anyone need to have some deep, profound reason for changing his or her hairstyle, other than “I got bored and fancied a change”?
Of course, the Daily Mail soon poked their nose in by publishing an “article” (I use that term very loosely) of Miley and her fiancé being papped by photographers on an evening out. Miley was covering her face which OF COURSE meant that she was regretting her getting her hair cut and didn't want to show it off. Because let's face it, any woman would feel shit about having short hair, right? Poor old Miley. Never mind love, it'll grow.
The idea that women should have long hair and men should have short hair is still hanging around us like a bad smell that refuses to be ousted out. It makes me despair that women who cut their hair shorter than deemed “acceptable” are still subject to such dreadful insults and are making the news. Who cares what Miley – or anyone for that matter – chooses to do with their hair? They're dead cells growing on somebody else's head, and it's up to them whether they want to shave it all off or let it grow down to their bum. Get over it, because it's just a fucking haircut.
On Monday morning, while scrolling through Twitter, I noticed that one of the day's top trending topics was that of former Disney star-turned-actress-turned-popstar Miley Cyrus. Intrigued by a couple of messages on my newsfeed stating that we should “leave Miley alone”, I decided to do a little digging and see what all the fuss was about. It turns out that all the girl had done was decide to cut her shoulder-length hair into a shorter style, and had posted a few photos of her new look on Twitter. But rather depressingly, had been subjected to a whole barrage of hate because of it.
Now, like most of the population over the age of 12, I couldn't give two shits about Miley Cyrus. In fact, I used to think she and Hannah Montana were two entirely separate people before I was ridiculed by a friend and informed that the latter was her all-singing, all-dancing, fictional alter-ego. I don't care what Miley is doing, who she's sleeping with, or how much weight she's lost. But while the details of her personal life do not interest me, I was pretty astonished to see so much abuse hurled at a young girl simply because she cut her hair.
The reactions to Miley's new look consisted of thousands of pubescent social networkers telling her that she was ugly and that she looked like a man and a lesbian, with endless comparisons being made to Draco Malfoy. Some “fans” even went as far to express their disapproval over her haircut by claiming they didn't like her anymore. Seriously, are you fucking joking me?
It made me pretty pissed off to see that the idea that women can only be beautiful or feminine if they have long hair is still quite clearly embedded into social attitudes. When the likes of Brad Pitt or Johnny Depp choose to grow their hair, no-one bats an eyelid. In fact, they're often referred to as rugged and handsome. So why is it that when a woman cuts her hair shorter, she is instantly branded as masculine? Are the likes of Miley Cyrus, Michelle Williams, or Emma Watson considered to be less feminine than say, Cheryl Cole? Last time I checked, being in possession of a vagina was what made you a woman, and not the length of the hair on your head.
Unfortunately, Miley clearly felt the need to explain her decision and took to Twitter to defend her new haircut, saying it made her feel “pretty” and “free”. But why should she have to justify a bloody haircut? It's her hair, and she gets to choose what she does with it. I'm sure many of the people slagging her off would have a fucking nervous breakdown if they were abused for something so regular and mundane as a new haircut.
Soon, news that Miley had donated her hair to a cancer charity began circling around Twitter. Whether this is true or not, we don't know for sure. If she really donated her hair to charity, then that's great. But if she didn't, and just wanted a new, shorter haircut, then who gives a shit? Why does anyone need to have some deep, profound reason for changing his or her hairstyle, other than “I got bored and fancied a change”?
Of course, the Daily Mail soon poked their nose in by publishing an “article” (I use that term very loosely) of Miley and her fiancé being papped by photographers on an evening out. Miley was covering her face which OF COURSE meant that she was regretting her getting her hair cut and didn't want to show it off. Because let's face it, any woman would feel shit about having short hair, right? Poor old Miley. Never mind love, it'll grow.
The idea that women should have long hair and men should have short hair is still hanging around us like a bad smell that refuses to be ousted out. It makes me despair that women who cut their hair shorter than deemed “acceptable” are still subject to such dreadful insults and are making the news. Who cares what Miley – or anyone for that matter – chooses to do with their hair? They're dead cells growing on somebody else's head, and it's up to them whether they want to shave it all off or let it grow down to their bum. Get over it, because it's just a fucking haircut.
